<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soon Mi Yoo: The Modality of Meaning in Essayisticity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jedypod.com/soon-mi-yoo-the-modality-of-meaning-in-essayististicity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jedypod.com/soon-mi-yoo-the-modality-of-meaning-in-essayististicity</link>
	<description>cerebular exocarp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristram</title>
		<link>http://jedypod.com/soon-mi-yoo-the-modality-of-meaning-in-essayististicity#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 09:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grace.evergreen.edu/~smijed07/blog/?p=12#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Always well spoken, Jed, I do this time have a real point of contention, which is your use of &quot;writerly&quot;. Having just finished my essay with which I had to fine comb Renov, I would be somewhat loathe to use essayistic and writerly interchangeably, for while I feel one is largely bound to the other, and they&#039;re not mutually exclusive, the reaches of writerly, I would assert, move far beyond the specific ideas Renov associates with the essayistic approach. In terms of this, I would also be careful about what you associate with a readerly approach, as again if you&#039;re attempting to say it is that which is not essayistic, rather than that which is not writerly, I don&#039;t know if the argument is comprehensible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always well spoken, Jed, I do this time have a real point of contention, which is your use of &#8220;writerly&#8221;. Having just finished my essay with which I had to fine comb Renov, I would be somewhat loathe to use essayistic and writerly interchangeably, for while I feel one is largely bound to the other, and they&#8217;re not mutually exclusive, the reaches of writerly, I would assert, move far beyond the specific ideas Renov associates with the essayistic approach. In terms of this, I would also be careful about what you associate with a readerly approach, as again if you&#8217;re attempting to say it is that which is not essayistic, rather than that which is not writerly, I don&#8217;t know if the argument is comprehensible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

